EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/000667_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Wed Oct 11 19:45:53 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 3KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA222645953; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:45:53 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from emout04.mail.aol.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA222585949; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:45:49 -0700
Received: by emout04.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA25275; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 22:38:30 -0400
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 22:38:30 -0400
From: [e-mail]
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Perception vs. Flyer#2
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

In a message dated 95-10-11 22:06:01 EDT, you write:

>> The Flyer is good, but the Perception is the best dispay board I've seen.
>And
>> I have seen many. Media 100, Avid 8000, Avid 1000, VideoVision SStudio,
>> Telecast, The Cube, Fast Video Machine, Flyer. I have worked with, and
used
>> all of these. Anytime you import and export your video signal in
component,
>> CAV, your video will be much cleaner.
>
>Actually I am mainly an animator.  I like having the flyer to be able to
>do good grabs for rotoscoping, ussing image map sequencs and integrating
>graphics into the clients video for them.  I had the amiga PAR and I
>really thought it sucked.. the best format I have ever worked in is 3/4'
>SP.  Most of my work has clean lines with simple backgrounds.  Actually my
>clients didn't see the roping and artifacting the PAR outputed, but I did.
>I lost some work with higher end places because of it.  The flyer output
>has gotten very clean since I have been able to get get it to do my
>animations into clips at HQ5.
>
>> The Flyer works somewhat like the PAR when it comes to gradient color
>> spreads. In short, IT CREATERS!
>What is that?
>
>> The Flyer is an
>> offline/Industrial editor, with an interface that a drunk, one armed
monkey
>> could use. It's great for what it was intended for. But the HIGH END will
>> demand component video, and if you want to work for them you'll need to
>> provide it.
>
>I plan to get an alpha eventually so i guess I am planning ot get a
>perception also for those clients that demand that quality. )I still
>would like to see a propler side by side comparison) The clients
>I am making money with right now and in the near future seem to think the
>flyer has great output.  Being somewhat of a drunk one arm monkey myself,
>I feel OK about owning a flyer.

Hey Joe!

Sorry that was supposed to be CRATERS! You know, Caves in. Damn it Jim! I'm
an animator, not a secretary!

Your right about the Flyer being much better with HQ5 for animations. I think
it is better that the PAR. But hey, All of the stuff I did this year for
BARNEY was transfered from the PAR to component Betacam. They liked it!

If you get a YC Plus board and hook it up to your Flyer you'll have some
really great video! They also make a 688 transcoder to convert your dub out
on your 3/4 SP deck to YC! I set one up for a client, (I'm also a dealer)
yesterday and it looks Great!

Tom Rennen
Intelligent Light Digital Imaging
214-420-6815


--
[e-mail] sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]